REVIEW: Reparation Of Appropriated Assets

Home  |  Book  |  Reviews

Reviews

Please use the Enter Comment facility below to give us a review on the Reparation Of Appropriated Assets section.

We appreciate all the reviews. Interesting reviews, for or against the ideas expressed in this section, will be accepted for public display on this page.

Summary

This AI summary is generated by Microsoft Edge Copilot:

This section outlines how Ukraine could seek **compensation for land and naval assets** lost during Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea, using the **CUTTR Plan** as the legal and diplomatic framework.

 **Land-Based Asset Appropriations**
- Before 2014, **Crimea was an autonomous republic** within Ukraine, with its own government.
- After Russia’s intervention (“little green men”), a **pro-Russian parliament was installed** and executed a **referendum** leading to annexation.
- Russian authorities seized:
  - **Government buildings** and infrastructure
  - **National military assets** like garrisons and armories
- Under the **CUTTR Plan**, Ukraine can demand **reparations for these appropriations**, as part of its negotiation terms.

**Naval Asset Seizures at Sevastopol**
- The **Ukrainian Navy and Russian Fleet** shared Sevastopol until 2014.
- Amid annexation:
  - Some Ukrainian vessels **escaped**.
  - Russia **blocked the harbor** by sinking an old cruiser.
  - Trapped Ukrainian ships were **partially returned**—mainly older models.
  - **Newer vessels were retained**, and reportedly **used for spare parts**.
- Through the CUTTR Plan, Ukraine may:
  - Demand **full return of naval assets**
  - Seek **compensation for damage or unreturned property**

The seizure of tangible assets underscores the broader geopolitical loss. Want to explore historical parallels where reparations shaped post-conflict treaties? There are some fascinating case studies.

References

See Reparation Of Appropriated Assets.